CCT Chairman
The CJN is seeking the disqualification of the CCT Chairman citing his indictment by the Economic

CJN Files Fresh Application, Wants CCT Chairman Disqualified

  • The CJN is seeking the disqualification of the CCT Chairman citing his indictment by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission for alleged N10m bribery.

The CJN is seeking the disqualification of the CCT Chairman citing his indictment by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission for alleged N10m bribery. According to Onnoghen, Umar pending case before the EFCC may be a means of sabotage by being subject to blackmail and threats from the executive arm of government which could impair his ability to be a fair arbiter. The motion which was signed by Chris Uche (SAN), Chief Sebastine Hon (SAN), Okon Efut (SAN), Chief Ogwu Onoja (SAN), Noah Abdul and George Ibrahim dated Monday, February 4, 2019 was brought pursuant to Rule 12(1) and (1A) of the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2016 and under the inherent  jurisdiction of the tribunal. Onnoghen is “seeking an order of this honourable tribunal for the honourable chairman of the tribunal, Honourable Danladi Umar, to disqualify/recuse himself from further participating in the adjudication of this case on the grounds of real likelihood of bias.

” The defence said Umar had “constructively convicted the CJN sought to be arraigned before him without either hearing from him or his being formally arraigned.” He added, “The learned chairman of the CCT (Hon Danladi Umar) is a tainted arbiter by reason of a criminal charge at the instance of the EFCC for receiving bribe money in the sum of N10m in charge number: CR/109/18 in FCT High Court by an organ under the supervision of the Attorney General of the Federation.“Incidentally, he (AGF) is the prosecutor and complainant in this matter such that with such a sword of Damocles hanging over him, and himself not just recusing himself from a quasi-judicial function, he is himself not likely to be a fair arbiter, but instead more likely to trade in the charges against him in a quasi-plea bargaining in the charge against him and enter summary conviction in this proceedings to please the prosecutor.“The applicant (Onnoghen) has no confidence in the chairman of the tribunal to do justice fairly between parties in this case as he is a man on a mission to please his masters.”